Such "mixed rich and poor", in fact, the government is shirking its responsibility（如此“贫富混居”，实为政府卸责）

Lanzhou City issued a policy to municipal construction of affordable housing led the implementation of "mixed rich and poor." Previously, Wuhan, Hubei Province also raised, not into film development and construction of affordable housing, promote mixed rich and poor. In practice, when the government in the land transfer a certain level of real estate developers to reduce land prices, developers required a certain percentage limit room. However, the implementation of this policy Lanzhou half-year results, but the rich do not buy it, poor people do not appreciate, the developer said in a clear opposition.
    Lanzhou City, the rich and the poor understanding of mixed mechanically mixed into the rich and the poor living in the same building, indeed am a bit bizarre. When I first came to Beijing, it stayed for a very rich and mixed in a building to house it in the playground where there were many to move back to households. The appearance of the building is very grand, magnificent, but entered the corridor, on the exposed flesh: mottled floor, such as ringworm, such as paint jet black corridor, the corridor door was closed is not on public doors and windows repair the hole, such as the Big Dipper and nobody winter north wind came whistling in irrigation.
    This is so unbearable because they do not pay to move back to family property fee heating costs, resulting in property services is getting worse; property poor service, but also to afford a property of some tenants refused to pay fees. This vicious cycle.
    Not to mention the wealth mixed the same building as nondescript as arbitrarily arranged is the same district of the rich and the poor may not be mixed, as some people think it so beautiful harmony. As the saying goes people with type polymer by groups, the choice of the market is to make each other "almost" the people gathered (settlements) with different types of people choose different residential, environmental and property services, and pay the appropriate price. The blending of different types of people in a hard, if "poor" can not afford the property costs, heating costs, are also followed by other people involved? Or by others on behalf of the property to pay a higher fee? Or, let the "poor" their minds are always uncomfortable, James felt the "rich" light, accounting for their cheap?
    In such a "mashup" environment, the rich unhappy, the poor may be more accurate, just as small traders selling peaches live in such luxury for their own communities, like the possibility of complete denial. He said: "Even if the government issued a policy, gives us rates, living inside, but high property costs here, I can not afford. Not to mention cars that people Hao Hao rooms, food and clothing are the best for us and our children is also a stimulus, is not conducive to the healthy growth of children. "
    Mixed rich and poor, a very harmonious and had very good words, and thus to the destruction of living. Well mixed rich and poor majority, "the rich" can reduce the cost of living, "the poor" can increase employment and increase opportunities. The problem is the real face of mixed rich and poor is not the case, but there should be a relative distance between rich and poor and relatively non-alienating. For example the same region, there are "poor" relative accumulation and relatively independent of the space, there are "rich" relative accumulation and relatively independent of the space.
    Lanzhou City, the reason the "rich and poor mixed" Gaode nondescript multi resentment fundamental reason is that local governments in rich and mixed by the good wishes of the government to shirk responsibility and blame to the developer, the developer will be the ultimate responsibility onto the buyers of commercial housing for home buyers to pay the high ground in the high prices after taxes again to pay for the cost of housing low-income solution!
    If local governments really have the sincerity and determination to solve the housing problems of low-income people, and practice the good wishes of mixed rich and poor, more than one way: You can cut out the huge piece of land revenue, specifically for protection of housing construction; can be used land and financial capital, is still a safe city to buy some old houses, after repairs were rented to low-income specialist, not a major demolition and construction; If the Government does not want, reluctant to make real money, then not to Villages are ruthless, let go to get the farmers to develop real estate, the government simply is not a one-time charge in the state land transfer from the housing above the generations of farmers receive property tax ... ... (The author is a researcher at the Bankers Trust Company)
本博文来自新浪博客；http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_6322f7dd0100kvri.html?tj=1
作者；童大焕