It is said that "after 80" untimely, is the most tragic generation. Today the major media coverage, "Survey: more than 90% of China" after 80 "can not support their parents," seems to have found evidence for this claim. After 80 is what people? From the ages of view, is undoubtedly the 20-30 year-olds. Some popular online scripts, sharp and profound picture of the unfortunate "after 80", such as childhood, like the emperor, as the battlefield of juvenile and young like a beggar, middle-aged, like wild dogs, old, no one raised, no one buried the dead class argument. Although biased, but also reflects the social transition to the "80s" have brought "pain." Is not it? They gave birth to now, the Chinese society has experienced an unprecedented continuous change and development. Rural to urban areas, plans to market, closed to open, to the iron rice bowl "is employment", shaking handle to the Internet, these drastic changes are accompanied by "80" after growth. But it is during this generation, family planning policy to them a month marked the one-child label, in the cosseted "Besieged City" received elementary education. After that, he is in "the outside world is very exciting, and very helpless," the environment to grow up deformed. So until today, "80" after issuing the "parents are the scourge of" the times cry. Although they enjoy the Expansion of the "advantages", the majority of parents who desire to enter the "ivory tower", education is not low, but the quality is compromised, and that life's pressures, the employment pressure, the pressure to buy a houseunprecedented. These "mud Buddha across the river - hardly protect themselves," the generation, to take "one to support two", "two raised four" of the task, certain reluctance. More than 90% "80" after the findings can not support their parents should be expected. Gradually into the old society no one to support old people, is a big problem. How do? First, how should look. A look at the data itself, worthy of scrutiny. Restrictions on the survey sample selection can not fully reflect the actual situation in the country. Care, if you and I are being investigated, normally more difficult to support their parents say, because China has always found "modest" tradition. It is evident from the statistical rate of 90% is some water. Second look "after 80" of the parents, they should mostly "after 50", is still able to "self", and even to suffer any "loss" to their children, life is a natural not a problem. Meanwhile, the pension transition from the family responsibilities of the main subjects of national or social responsibility, is sooner or later. The more forward, the social pension system should be more complete, 90% could not support the number should drop a lot, do his own bluff. Look at the macro that the transformation of Chinese society into a successful, is "80" after the key to solving the difficulties parents support the key. Especially in the face of an aging society coming to our pension, the pension system will go, my cause for concern. Do not "wear new shoes to take the old path," "old wine in new bottles", the historical accounts to help people also. If the environment is not good, "after 80" are still saddled with high input and low output or employment today laid off tomorrow, "yoke", it is not just "80" after the trouble, but the entire community, "pain" of. Therefore, material support, not that "monsters" of the problem. The difficulties and material support to more than, the spiritual care of the elderly but is intractable or that no solution of the problem. "Care resources" scarce, is "80" after the most difficult to support their parents and most trouble. Such as life care, such as domestic service, like cleaning to help the elderly; the elderly sick in bed a short time, the side also need someone to take care around the clock; needs of the elderly mental, emotional spiritual needs, with the elderly to get out to see, touch community, to enjoy life, and so on. "Everywhere at once", is an indisputable fact. "80" after that, "After 90" no better, they are more independent and support their parents reject.The face of an aging society, "Rain Comes from Wind" situation, how the material and spiritual support to solve the problem of elderly people, the time to consider, and so can not afford, not slow. Government, society, family, three aspects need to work to try and try again. Especially the government and society must take the "ton output capacity," The determination of the system level and allocation of resources, power and make our "80" after, "after 90" through "difficult pension" crisis. Social "disease" grew out of, in addition to the right remedy, no other way!
有人说，“80后”生不逢时，是最悲惨的一代。今日各大媒体报道的《调查：中国90%以上的“80后”无法赡养父母》，似乎为此说法找到了佐证。
80后是些什么人呢？从年龄层次来看，无疑是20—30岁的年轻人。网上流行的一些段子，尖锐而深刻地描绘了不幸的“80后”，诸如童年像皇帝、少年像战场、青年像乞丐、中年像野狗、老了没人养、死后没人埋之类的论调。虽然有失偏颇，但也反映出社会转型给“80后”们带来的“阵痛”。
不是吗？他们从生下来到现在，就经历了中国社会前所未有的不断变革和发展。农村到城市，计划到市场，封闭到开放，铁饭碗到“被就业”，摇把子到互联网，种种剧变都伴随着“80后”的成长。而恰恰在这一代，计划生育的国策把他们一个个打上独生子女的标签，在娇生惯养的“围城”中接受启蒙教育。尔后，又处在“外面的世界很精彩，也很无奈”的环境中，畸形地长大成人。以至于直至今天，“80后”发出了“父母皆祸害”的时代呐喊。尽管他们享受到扩招的“好处”，大部分可以进父辈们向往的“象牙塔”，受教育程度不低，但质量是打了折扣的，且生活的压力、就业的压力、买房的压力前所未有。
这些“泥菩萨过河——自身难保”的一代，要担负起“一个养两个”、“两个养四个”的重任，确实有些勉为其难。90%以上的“80后”无法赡养父母的调查结论，应该是意料之中的。
逐步进入老年社会的老人们没人养，是个大问题。怎么办？
首先应怎么看。一看数据的本身，值得推敲。受调查样本选择的限制，不可能全面反映全国的实际情况。将心比心，如果你我是被调查人，一般会说赡养父母比较困难，因为符合中国一贯“谦虚谨慎”的传统。如此看来，90%的统计率是有些水分的。
二看“80后”的父母，他们应该大都是“50后”，目前还是能够“自食其力”的，甚至还能够“倒贴”给自己的子女，生活自然不成问题。同时，养老由家庭责任主体过渡到国家或社会责任主体，是迟早的事。越往前走，社会养老制度应该越完善，90%不能赡养的数字应该会下降不少，别自己吓唬自己。
再看宏观一点，中国社会的转型成不成功，乃“80后”解决赡养父母困难的关键之关键。尤其是面对老龄化社会的来临，我们的退休金、养老金制度将走向何方，值得关注。千万别“穿新鞋走老路”，“新瓶装旧酒”，把历史账让现代人还。如果大环境不好，“80后”们仍然背负高投入低产出或者今天下岗明天就业的“枷锁”，那就不仅仅是“80后”的麻烦了，而是整个社会的“痛”了。因此，物质上赡养，倒不是“天塌下来”的问题。
与物质赡养的困难想比，对老人的精神照顾反而是个难解或者说无解之题。“照料资源”的稀缺，是“80后”赡养父母最棘手也是最烦恼的。比如生活照料，像家政服务一样帮老年人打扫卫生；老年人生病短时间卧床时，身边也需要有人全天候照料；满足老年人心理、情感方面的精神需要，带老人出去走走、看看，接触社会，享受生活，等等。“分身乏术”，是不争的事实。
“80后”如此，“90后”也好不到哪里去，他们更独立、更有赡养父母的排斥心理。面对老年社会的“山雨欲来风满楼”境况，如何从物质和精神上解决好老人的赡养问题，该是考虑的时候了，等不起，慢不得。政府、社会、家庭，三个方面都需要努力努力再努力。尤其是政府和社会，要以“壮士断腕”的决心，从制度层面和资源分配上发力，让我们的“80后”、“90后”度过“养老难”危机。
社会“病”多起来了，除了对症下药，别无他法！
本文来自新浪博客；
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_699f74c30100kxq9.html?tj=1
作者；
楚汉雄风
博文
没有评论:
发表评论