Recently, Credit Suisse issued a "Global Wealth Report" Internet users in China have led to a rain-like "bricks." The "World Wealth Report," said China's per capita Cai Fuzhi adults over the past decade from 6,000 in 2000 U.S. dollars to 18,000 U.S. dollars in 2010 (global per capita wealth in 2010 was 4.38 million), equivalent to 12 million yuan.However, netizens have innocence, saying he "was full of" the.
Should be said that UBS's the "World Wealth Report" or the more reliable. Chinese adult per capita wealth of 120,000 yuan and not that much, just only 41% of global per capita wealth, which also shows that worldwide, the Chinese were far from well-off level.But is such a report, or provoke a collective of Chinese Internet users, "smashing the stone." Some netizens direct question: $ 18,000 so I am very proud, but I just do not know what $ 18,000 fortune where it is.
Where is the Wealth $ 18,000, this is indeed a lot of people issues of common concern. The reason why users have "hit the bricks and mortar", because also here, so that he "was full of" the. Well, that $ 18,000 of wealth Where is it?
First of all need to face reality is that this $ 18,000 of wealth for many people who really are the "rich" the. For the vast majority of rural families, for some medium and small cities in central and western regions of most ordinary families, these families have no adult is basically the 12 million fortune. Because 12 million of wealth per capita is a national adult data, a lot of people suddenly "has a" wealth of 12 million, apparently "is average", after all, 80% of China's wealth lies in the hands of 20%, while Today, China is also a land of mass production billionaire. Such as the end of last year, China has billionaires reached 5.5 million. Released in October this year, "2010 China Rich List" shows that more than 10 billion yuan in China to 1363 the number of rich people, rich 97 billion, of which more is Wahaha head Zong registered 800 billion Top richest man in China. Together with the rich "operator average", even with the pauper and Zong "average", that is a "billionaire" the. Therefore, this $ 18,000 people a considerable portion of wealth is "filled" in the rich purse.
Secondly, this $ 18,000 of wealth, became the people's property, such as housing.UBS report shows that real per capita in China is $ 9,600 adults (about 6.4 million yuan). In fact, for some residents of large cities, where they only 64,000 yuan of real estate. If this year in October, average transaction price of each commodity housing in Shanghai reached 2.5485 million yuan, if calculated according to 4 adults per capita has more than 600,000 yuan. If the average with the National People's National People have to "dipping", and many people therefore "was rich." In fact, that is, the owner of these houses, they also feel the "taste of the wealth," because they actually become a "house slave." Thus, for many Taiwanese, even if they have even far more than 18,000 U.S. dollars of wealth, but because of their wealth into real estate, so they are still "negative", even though they have entered into the "Millionaire" ranks, but they really did not 120,000 yuan in cash.
Thus, users have to UBS, "smashing bricks and mortar," the UBS report is not a problem, but $ 18,000 per capita wealth of the problems people lack a sense of happiness. The problem is our government departments should be concerned about. As a government department, on one hand is to effectively reduce the polarization distribution of social wealth, as central in the "second Five-Year Plan" proposed by the stresses, so that "significant increase in the income of low-income, middle income groups continues to expand" , so that low-income persons to have more social wealth.On the other hand, to make high above the prices down, or so low-income families to live in the protection of housing, low-rent housing. For any people, in the case of the same wealth, its happiness is inversely proportional to real estate, once all of the performance of people's wealth for the property, then he is likely to be a "house slaves."
(译者;谷歌翻译)(作者;皮海洲)
(本文转载自新浪博客;http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_540eaf530100nqdt.html?tj=1)
没有评论:
发表评论